|
House of ZAN Forum This is the forum for ZAN group
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Erik Dodd Forum User
Age: 44 Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Posts: 490 Location: Hamilton, OH
|
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:02 am Post subject: Peep me...or at least what I post |
|
|
Ok don't watch this video if you're easily offeneded. linkage _________________ Είναι όλα τα ελληνικά σε με
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ravage Forum Legend
Age: 54 Joined: 27 Jun 2005 Posts: 1739 Location: ROFLbama
|
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
You know, I honestly don't know why anyone would be offended by that.
It's clever, and funny, especially given that it's black people doing it...but it'd be funny just the same. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Plague Site Admin
Age: 44 Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Posts: 1562 Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
that is pretty funny. _________________ "Never fear, I is here!"
Jared Sellars (a.k.a. Plague) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Grand Master Sef Forum Legend
Age: 42 Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Posts: 2439 Location: DERPlahoma
|
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thats funny & I'm not offended.
What I hate about the N word is that black people can use it & then they get offended when others say it to them. I totally agree with the last part. No one should be allowed to use it OR everyone should. kinda like the F word or any other derogetory word.
"New rims nig?" lawl...that chick was hillarious! _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dana Forum Legend
Age: 48 Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Posts: 1618 Location: Right behind you
|
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You all be mah niggaz. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Grand Master Sef Forum Legend
Age: 42 Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Posts: 2439 Location: DERPlahoma
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cracker or Cracka is just as offensive as Nigger or Nigga. I seriously suggest that no one use them or everyone be allowed to use them.
Kers & Nigs tho...thats funny. lawl. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ravage Forum Legend
Age: 54 Joined: 27 Jun 2005 Posts: 1739 Location: ROFLbama
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
The problem is, certain politicians now expect us to buy that certain words are, in themselves, evil, inappropriate, or in this case, racist. This is simply not the case.
I've had an opportunity to study language in depth this year, despite my insistance that I won't be continuing. At no time in the last hundred years (and more) has popular linguistics/philosophy stressed an absolute of this degree in language. Instead, context, and percieved meaning by the reciever are where the emphasis lies.
In this case, the use of the N word is put in a context where it is not meant as an offense. When some of us throw it around within our group, it's also in a particular context that is not meant to offend, but entertain. That said, if used in the context of intending offense, the word could indeed be considered racist. Of course, I could call someone an Inkjet Printer, and if I meant it to be offensive, or racist, it would carry every bit of unethical meaning as the dreaded N word.
Of course, then you have to take perception into account. Someone could very easily percieve the N word in a racist fashion, and take offense to it. They are less likely to percieve "Inkjet Printer" in the same way. However, this is not because of a hard truth that is carried as meaning by the words themselves, but by the accepted societal habits that surround them. In every case, when determining the meaning of words, one should always pay attention to the context.
It sounds like a hard job, to always be analyzing conversation for contextual elements, but it's actually something that comes very naturally. Just like detecting sarcasm, detecting particular context is rather easy most of the time. If you aren't clear, you should ask the source.
What I'm pointing to is that anyone who claims that a word, or occurrence is essentially and always "racist", "homophobic", "harassing", etc. is applying a pretty strict objective point of view...ironically, something the left in this country usually fight against. I guess if it serves your purpose and gets you votes... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Grand Master Sef Forum Legend
Age: 42 Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Posts: 2439 Location: DERPlahoma
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
See Damin I agree with you 100%. However, the flaw with your arguement (& mine since I agree with you) is this. Most people DON'T take context into consideration when people speak. This is MY point on the subject. Life is rough & I simply steer cleer of using dangerous words, such as the N word, because there are so many STUPID people who don't even know how to SPELL context.
In the rare case that I'm with people who would understand, such as this group, I may use those dangerous words, but thats it. "Sup nigz!" is such an example that our group uses & its hillarious because its intended to be as such.
So, my bottom line is that I can't use dangerous words most of the time, even in context, because of the idiots who don't use context out number those of us who have a brain cell & do.
Ya feel me?!
[Looks down at shoes for notes.] _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Deathscythe343 Forum Pro
Age: 44 Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Posts: 544
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am all y'alls nigog _________________ Why run? You'll only die tired.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ravage Forum Legend
Age: 54 Joined: 27 Jun 2005 Posts: 1739 Location: ROFLbama
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spears used for eel fishing?
Indeed! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
seedosrun Forum User
Age: 41 Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Posts: 80 Location: Monroe, MI
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lol ... i love the white person sign. _________________ [img:a19668bb4d]http://presidentsimpson.com/simpson08.gif[/img:a19668bb4d] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Talismonger Forum User
Joined: 28 Nov 2005 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 12:04 am Post subject: Gotta jump on the Adam Bandwagon |
|
|
Language is all about communication, and some words have become so supercharged that they risk conveying the wrong message in almost all situations.
The N word is just such an example, and, since it has a strong historical connection to oppression and racism, those are the messages that surface first. You can get away with it if you are black b/c people assume that you are not trying to denigrate your own race. That reasoning just doesn't make sense in other contexts.
Sure it would be ideal if everyone took the time to listen to everyone else and carefully consider the context of the speaker before reacting, but that's unrealistic and unproductive. We simply don't have the time or desire to get to know everyone else that well. If you want to use speech with a strongly racist meaning/connotation, then that is your choice, but don't expect everyone else to ignore the socially constructed meaning of the language. There are always other words to use, and maybe using them is one way we can stand up against our country's racist history/present.
Just a thought. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ravage Forum Legend
Age: 54 Joined: 27 Jun 2005 Posts: 1739 Location: ROFLbama
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow...this thread brought Spence out of the woodwork! W00t.
While I agree with what you're saying (especially in practical application), I have a hypothesis that the reason the N word is so endowed with bad "mojo" these days is not actually due to oppression, and has very little to do with the days of slavery. Sure, it's the origin of the negativity of the term, but I think the use of the word over the last 30 years or so has somewhat changed the landscape.
For example, the simple fact that blacks have taken to using the word frequently speaks volumes about the versatility of language over generations. Taking a derogatory "white" word that refers to one's race and then assimilating that into a part of speech that, in a way, refers to a sort of common bond (perhaps brotherhood) is admirable in my eyes. It's very much like a battle scar for an entire ethnic group being put on display.
Where my issues begin is the exclusion of all outsiders from any way of utilizing that part of speech. What I mean is that for many, whites are absolutely incapable of uttering the word, even as a reference to the word itself (such as all of us typing "the N word" here). That is silly, especially since modern-day blacks have no idea what slavery was like any more than we do. I'm not going to argue that we really have necessity to utilize the word in common speech as blacks may, but automatically taking offense when used outside the African-American culture/context is really having your cake and eating it too.
I think that categorizing words differently depending on the race of the utterer is actually just propagating racism, not helping relieve it. Rather than simply censoring our speech (which as I've said before, is inherently neutral), we should understand the reason that words mean what they do to different people, and affect change in such a way that those negative connotations lose their validity.
I'm with Adam in the idea that either everyone should say it or nobody should. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Grand Master Sef Forum Legend
Age: 42 Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Posts: 2439 Location: DERPlahoma
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ravage wrote: |
Wow...this thread brought Spence out of the woodwork! W00t.
While I agree with what you're saying (especially in practical application), I have a hypothesis that the reason the N word is so endowed with bad "mojo" these days is not actually due to oppression, and has very little to do with the days of slavery. Sure, it's the origin of the negativity of the term, but I think the use of the word over the last 30 years or so has somewhat changed the landscape.
For example, the simple fact that blacks have taken to using the word frequently speaks volumes about the versatility of language over generations. Taking a derogatory "white" word that refers to one's race and then assimilating that into a part of speech that, in a way, refers to a sort of common bond (perhaps brotherhood) is admirable in my eyes. It's very much like a battle scar for an entire ethnic group being put on display.
Where my issues begin is the exclusion of all outsiders from any way of utilizing that part of speech. What I mean is that for many, whites are absolutely incapable of uttering the word, even as a reference to the word itself (such as all of us typing "the N word" here). That is silly, especially since modern-day blacks have no idea what slavery was like any more than we do. I'm not going to argue that we really have necessity to utilize the word in common speech as blacks may, but automatically taking offense when used outside the African-American culture/context is really having your cake and eating it too.
I think that categorizing words differently depending on the race of the utterer is actually just propagating racism, not helping relieve it. Rather than simply censoring our speech (which as I've said before, is inherently neutral), we should understand the reason that words mean what they do to different people, and affect change in such a way that those negative connotations lose their validity.
I'm with Adam in the idea that either everyone should say it or nobody should. |
Amen brotha. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|